Head down, full speed ahead is sometimes a great way to approach something new. That’s the approach I took to learning about wikis. It now seems somewhat appropriate, having learned that ‘wiki’ is actually derived from ‘wiki-wiki” a Hawaiian phrase meaning ‘quick.’ (Richardson, 2006, pp. 59). Appropriate, as well because I've learned that ideas sprout up quickly.
Reflections on the process of learning about Wikis
I have to admit, I’m fairly confident heading into this week’s blog entry, as the topic is a tool I’m pretty confident with: wikis! Over the past few years, Wikipedia has become a go-to site for many us (and our students) for learning quickly about a topic we want or need to know about. When I first started visiting it, I didn’t understand the collaborative aspect of the site. However, I was warned of this aspect by some friends.
Instead of starting with the “Wiki Trailfire” I started to dive right in, as if I was an expert already. So, I created a wiki for my class to discuss the novels I’m using for our “Grand Conversations” literature study. I drafted a permission letter for my students’ parents/guardians, and forwarded it to my principal (who was very excited about it), who sent it to ‘headquarters’ to be run by our FOIP and records manager. She was very helpful and assisted me in being thorough and clear throughout the letter.
Then I went through the “Wiki Trailfire” and visited some different wikis to learn about the possibilities of what we can do with wikis. The example of the camping trip (Wikis in Plain English) really struck a cord with me. I’m sure we’ve all been in that situation with endless emails back and forth about what to bring, and then when we do arrive, we’re missing key items, or have some items doubl or tripled up (what are we going to do with three clothes lines?)
Discussion of Wikis in terms of my own personal learning
I’ve used wikis tones in the past to learn new things. Well, that’s kind of a lie. I’ve used one wiki mainly to learn new things. Yep, you guessed it: Wikipedia. I just find the site so great for a quick little check in. For example, when you need to know what the local delicacies are in central Brazil, or what the flag of Croatia looks like.
However, that being said, I’ve only been on the consuming side of wikipedia. I’ve never added or edited content, until now that is.
For my class wiki, I have to admit, it’s been pretty exciting to see my students latch on to it and participate to no end. There have been hundreds of posts in only a few weeks. I started with initial discussion questions for each novel. Students began to join and respond to my initial posts. Then, without my encouragement, they started a new category and discussion for a book we’re using for a read-aloud.
Discussion of Wikis in terms of teaching & learning
My brain is whirling with possibilities and images. What will my class look like a year from now? A class blog, with a link to our class wiki? It makes me a bit sad that my position is finished at the end of October and that I won’t be able to explore this further.
For teaching, this has been a phenomenal tool for literature study, as I’ve mentioned above. We still have discussions at school, but this allows for even more thoughtful responses, and allows my students who are incredibly shy to find their voice and contribute their ideas to our discussions. That’s been one of the most powerful things I’ve witnessed.
I enjoy the whole ‘free labour’ aspect of wikis. Other people are doing work and I am able to use it to learn and/or teach. For example, lessons are being uploaded to http//:teacherslounge.editme.com (Richardson, 2006, pp.69). Another wiki, called “The Teacher’s Desk,” which I found at wetpaint.com contains great lessons as well at all levels. There’s also an area for discussion, but it has not been utilized.
Another great aspect for teaching and learning is it’s “up-to-date-ness” (Davies & Merchant, 2009, pp.93). Sites, such as Wikipedia are constantly being updated. It sure beats some of the out of date textbooks and books we have in our schools. Also, if there’s an error, or a vandal, it’s usually fixed within a few hours (Richardson, 2006, pp.61). There’s also a ‘revert’ function on most wikis, where you can undo a past user’s actions.
One concern would be the privacy issue. However, I set mine up to be private, so that only the students can log-in. Now, I do realize privacy can still be an issue, but I asked students not to post any identifying information (ie. full name, address, etc). These guidelines were also outlined in the letter to parents/guardians. I did ask them to create a user name that’s either their first name or something close to it, so that they would be easily identifiable to myself and their classmates.
Another concern I had was that students could post something inappropriate, or embarrassing, either intentionally or ignorantly. I had to set up expectation, and also trust that they would act appropriately within the confines of the wiki. Richardson (2006) points out that, “Wiki projects in schools have worked best when the teacher loosens the reins a bit and lets students manage the content of the site” (Richardson, pp. 65). So there is an element of trust in this context. One student did make a comment where he was critical of a character’s name. He, in a sense, was making fun of the name and was not in essence contributing to our efforts to thoughtfully discuss these books. Instead of me talking to him about it in school, or posting my thoughts on it, another student stepped up and politely pointed out that it wasn’t really a valid or thought-provoking comment.
Another concern for me about starting a class wiki was a worry that this would hinder my quest for a work/life balance. I worried that I’d need to check in a few times per night and moderate and monitor the discussions. However, as I mentioned previously that’s not the case. Students are moderating themselves. And, they are also posing their own questions/discussion threads. That being said, I do check in at least once a day and see how the discussions are going. Every couple days, I also throw in my own 2 cents to let them know I’m reading their posts and that I’m interested in the literature as well.
With these concerns in mind, the benefits far outweigh them. Richardson (2006) points out some of the skills students are learning by using a wiki: “Students are not only learning how to publish content; they are also learning how to develop and use all sorts of collaborative skills, negotiating with others to agree on correctness, meaning, relevance and more” (Richardson, pp.65). If this doesn’t sound like preparing our students for the future, I’m not sure what does.
In conclusion, I think wikis are a powerful tool to utilize. I look forward to using them to accomplish different purposes and to grow, collaborate and learn with my colleagues, as well as my students.
References:
Davies, M., & Merchant, G. (2009). Web 2.0 for schools. New York: Peter Lang.
Richardson, W. (2009). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms. 2nd Ed. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.